Evaluation Framework MVP

Link to the Airtable

https://airtable.com/invite/l?inviteId=invFUF0FIKwnJuvbu&inviteToken=589cc37dd7a24e8169bec36c0cc3a5348bc01252fbe28734a9c2b33cba0ec622&utm_medium=email&utm_source=product_team&utm_content=transactional-alerts

Vision

• This could become the central piece of a platform we provide.
• Together with tokenomics diagrams and articles this could become the go-to location for investors to learn about fundamentals of protocols.
• New tokens might even reach out to us in order to get listed.
• Potential avenue for premium type content.
• NGMI Score to quickly rate the legitimacy of a project

NGMI Score Idea

We recorded a Ponzi podcast that will be out on Thursday and as part of that thought about that the level of 'ponziness' is a spectrum that we might be able to evaluate for a project.

We thought about calling it the NGMI-score; the higher the score the more likely it is a Ponzi, pyramid or zero-sum-game. We could start with a simple set of questions to get and idea of the 'ponziness'. Later we could add some fancy evaluation calculation to create a score.

Here are some initial ideas on questions:

1. Is new money needed to keep the system alive?
2. Does the project have intrinsic value? Does it increase? How is value created?
3. Does it return any yield/dividend? Is it clear where that comes from? Are the returns promised by the protocol / app?
4. Is there a belief system involved? How strong is the belief in the system?
5. How many tokens where distributed to founders/team/investors etc.?
6. Can the initiative continue without the leader/founder?
7. consistent returns regardless market conditions,